<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;It&#8217;s Just Baby Fat&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zmama75.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/its-just-baby-fat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zmama75.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/its-just-baby-fat/</link>
	<description>Figuring out how to treat my body right.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: petiteyogini</title>
		<link>http://zmama75.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/its-just-baby-fat/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>petiteyogini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zmama75.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-251</guid>
		<description>WEIRD! I have no idea what to say to that other than, is there any other kind of baby? Aren't babies supposed to be "fat"? for health and developmental reasons. Are we going to start seeing skinny babies as the ideal for mothers to achieve (along with their own bodies)? 

I'm sure that the product is just meant to be cute, but still, it is odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WEIRD! I have no idea what to say to that other than, is there any other kind of baby? Aren&#8217;t babies supposed to be &#8220;fat&#8221;? for health and developmental reasons. Are we going to start seeing skinny babies as the ideal for mothers to achieve (along with their own bodies)? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the product is just meant to be cute, but still, it is odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
